Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Sponsor: Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Summary
This clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation and radiofrequency ablation to treat persistent atrial fibrillation in adults. Participants will: Undergo pulsed field ablation or radiofrequency ablation. Keep follow-up for at least 12 months.
Official title: Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized, Open-label, Non-inferior Study
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
700
Start Date
2025-02-15
Completion Date
2027-02-15
Last Updated
2025-01-24
Healthy Volunteers
No
Interventions
Pulsed Field Ablation
Patients will be treated with pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Radiofrequency Ablation
Patients will be treated with radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Locations (1)
Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, China