Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT06794385
PHASE4

Comparison of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Satisfaction of Different Methods for Labor Induction

Sponsor: University Medical Centre Ljubljana

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The objective of this interventional study is to compare the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with two commonly used methods of labor induction: low-dose oral misoprostol and the vaginal delivery system with dinoprostone. The study aims to identify the most suitable induction method for specific subgroups of patients based on parity, body mass index (BMI), age, and cervical ripeness, as well as assess patient preferences for these induction methods.

Key Details

Gender

FEMALE

Age Range

18 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

200

Start Date

2025-01-22

Completion Date

2025-12-01

Last Updated

2025-01-27

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DRUG

dinoprostone vaginal delivery system

Pregnant women in this group will receive a vaginal delivery system containing 10 mg of dinoprostone for labor induction.

DRUG

low dose peroral misoprostol

Participants will be induced with a low-dose oral formulation of misoprostol, administered per protocol at 25 mcg every 2 hours

Locations (1)

UMC Ljubljana

Ljubljana, Slovenia