Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Additional Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee (IPACK) After Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries
Sponsor: Ain Shams University
Summary
This study aims to evaluate the effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block only versus adding posterior knee block, known as the Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block with Continuous Adductor Canal Block (CACB) after arthroscopic knee surgeries.
Official title: A Comparative Study Between the Effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Additional Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee (IPACK) After Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
21 Years - 65 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
70
Start Date
2025-01-30
Completion Date
2025-10-01
Last Updated
2025-01-31
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Continuous adductor canal block
Patients will receive continuous adductor canal block.
Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule
Patients will receive Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee
Locations (1)
Ain Shams University
Cairo, Egypt