Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT06833034
NA

Comparing a Novel Closed Exposure Technique to a Conventional Method for Palatally Impacted Maxillary Canines

Sponsor: Malmö University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

A multi-center Randomized Clinical Trial, (RCT) on treatment effectiveness of two different closed surgical exposure techniques, one including additional bone removal and a second conventional without removal of additional bone, during treatment of palatally impacted maxillary canines. A comparison between the two methods regarding the anchorage situation for the incisors will be performed as well. Introduction Surgical exposure of impacted maxillary canines together with orthodontic treatment has long been advocated. Closed exposure with placement of an auxiliary attachment with a chain, followed by traction of the canine with orthodontic forces is commonly clinical used to avoid complications with the open procedure (Kokich 2004). Both open and closed methods and orthodontic treatment are one of the most time-consuming orthodontic treatments. Therefore, it is valuable to try to find methods which can reduce the total treatment time and make the treatments as comfortable as possible for the patient. To reduce the treatment time, study I investigates a novel strategy for traction of the canine. Another strategy to reduce the treatment time might be to facilitate the movement of the canine by additional bone removal in the eruption direction out to the alveolar crest. This has been used of a few orthodontists in one clinic for some years. No negative side-effects have been seen. There are, however, no studies for comparison of the two techniques. Aim The primary aims of this Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) is to evaluate the treatment effectiveness of two different surgical closed exposure techniques of palatally impacted canines before the orthodontic treatment; a) with removal of bone in traction direction and b) without removal of bone in traction direction and to evaluate the anchorage situations. Outcome variables The outcome variables will be: 1) Treatment time for the canine to be exposed in the oral cavity; 2) Treatment time for the canine to be in the dental arch and 3) Treatment time for the canine to have reached the right position in the dental arch. Subjects Sixty-six patients between 10-18- years, will be recruited to the study. Patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines are consecutively recruited at three orthodontic clinics in Lund, Karlshamn and Ängelholm.

Official title: To Compare the Effectiveness of a Novel Closed Exposure Technique With Removal of Bone Tissue and a Conventional Technique During Treatment of Palatally Impacted Maxillary Canines by Closed Surgical Exposure and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

10 Months - 18 Months

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

66

Start Date

2025-03-07

Completion Date

2026-07-10

Last Updated

2025-05-11

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

PROCEDURE

The novel surgical method

Additional bone removal in intended direction for tooth movement

PROCEDURE

The conventional surgical method

The conventional method to use surgery

Locations (2)

Borgska villans specialisttandvård

Lund, Skåne County, Sweden

Malmö universitet

Malmo, Skåne County, Sweden