Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Optimizing Transhumeral Osseointegration Prosthesis Control
Sponsor: University of Alberta
Summary
Upper limb amputation above the elbow results in a significant loss of function. There have been many advancements in surgery and prosthetic devices to restore arm function, but many people still reject upper limb prostheses. This is due to difficulties with how the socket fits and poor control of the device. Above-elbow prostheses are particularly challenging to use for several reasons. The socket must go all the way into the shoulder for stability. To hold the prosthesis onto the remaining arm, there needs to be a strap across the chest and shoulder. The prosthesis can be heavy, and the socket can slip or move around. This makes it hard to use muscle signals in the residual limb to control advanced prosthetic devices. People with limb loss are interested in advanced prostheses to use them reliably for day-to-day activities. Bone-anchored prostheses (BAPs) are a new approach. They are for people with upper limb loss who can't use socket prostheses. The surgery involves putting a titanium rod into the remaining bone, which, over time, joins with the bone. This implant extends through the skin. It enables the direct attachment of the prosthetic parts (like the elbow and hand). With BAPs, there is no need for a socket. Also, there is a well-known surgery called "Targeted muscle reinnervation" (TMR). It improves the number of arm muscle control signals. These signals are used to control myoelectric prostheses. However, after both these surgeries, there is a lack of research that shows how best to train the muscle signals to use an advanced myoelectric arm and little evidence on what factors actually improve in a person's day-to-day life when using such a prosthesis. This study aims to implement an enhanced muscle training protocol and fitting with a myoelectric (muscle signal-controlled) device after receiving OI and TMR for above-elbow amputation, and to evaluate the outcomes over time. The goal is to understand whether these advanced prostheses improve prosthesis use and function in daily life.
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 65 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
5
Start Date
2025-09-01
Completion Date
2028-12-31
Last Updated
2025-11-18
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Myoelectric prosthesis
The interventions in this study are (1) an enhanced muscle training protocol and (2) fitting with a myoelectric (muscle signal-controlled) prosthetic device after receiving an osseointegrated implant and targeted muscle reinnervation.
Locations (2)
Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada