Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT06864663
NA

A Comparative Study of Combined Adductor Canal and Interspace Between Popliteal Artery and Knee Capsule Versus Combined Adductor Canal and Genicular Nerve in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Sponsor: Ain Shams University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of combined adductor canal block (ACB) with interspace between popliteal artery and the knee capsule (IPACK) versus combined ACB with genicular nerve block (GNB) for providing analgesia in knee arthroplasty. The investigators hypothesize that the analgesic efficacy of ACB combined with GNB will be non-inferior to that of ACB combined with IPACK. Additionally, the investigators aim to assess whether the combination of ACB and GNB results in a significantly lower occurrence of sensory or motor block affecting the tibial and common peroneal nerves compared to ACB and IPACK

Official title: A Comparative Study of Combined Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block and Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) Versus Combined Adductor Canal Block and Genicular Nerve Block Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 70 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

70

Start Date

2025-03-15

Completion Date

2025-10-15

Last Updated

2025-03-07

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DRUG

nerve block with bupivacaine 0.25%

ultrasound guided adductor canal block and interspace between the popliteal artery and the knee capsule using bupivacaine 0.25%

DRUG

Nerve Block with bupivacaine 0.25%

ultrasound guided combined adductor canal block and genicular nerve block using bupivacaine 0.25%

Locations (1)

Ain Shams University

Cairo, Egypt