Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women：A Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial
Sponsor: Nanchong Central Hospital
Summary
This study aims to compare the clinical effects of uterine round ligament preservation versus resection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women.The primary outcomes included Time required for patient surgery.The secondary outcomes included Inguinal hernia recurrence,quality of life assessment,Indicators of postoperative recovery,, et al.
Official title: Comparative Study on the Effect of Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women： a Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial
Key Details
Gender
FEMALE
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
466
Start Date
2024-09-20
Completion Date
2027-03-01
Last Updated
2025-03-25
Healthy Volunteers
No
Interventions
To remove the uterine uterine ligament
Both groups underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The preservation group retained the uterine round ligament, while the resection group had it removed.
Locations (1)
Nanchong Central Hospital
Nanchong, Sichuan, China