Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Pulsed Radiofrequency
Sponsor: Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Summary
This study investigates the effectiveness of two treatments-genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation and pulsed radiofrequency-in reducing pain and improving function in osteoarthritis patients. These techniques, used after diagnostic nerve blocks, aim to provide long-lasting pain relief. Despite both being found effective, no clear consensus exists on which method is superior. The study seeks to compare these techniques and contribute new insights to the existing literature.
Official title: "Comparison of the Effects of Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Radiofrequency Applications on Pain Levels in Patients With Osteoarthritis, Guided by Ultrasound''
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
80
Start Date
2024-04-01
Completion Date
2025-05-30
Last Updated
2025-03-25
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Genicular nerve pulse radiofrequency
After performing a diagnostic block with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine on the superior medial, lateral, and inferior medial genicular nerve branches, patients who experience more than 50% benefit from the procedure will undergo pulsed radiofrequency aplication.
Locations (1)
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, Cankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)