Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT06937047
NA

Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Removal of 4-10 mm Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps

Sponsor: Shandong University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This was a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for the removal of 4-10 mm pedunculated colorectal polyps. The primary outcome was delayed postpolypectomy bleeding. The secondary outcomes included immediate postpolypectomy bleeding, procedure time, en bloc resection, complete histologic resection, use of haemostatic clips and perforation rate.

Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Removal of 4-10 mm Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 80 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

196

Start Date

2025-05-06

Completion Date

2027-02-28

Last Updated

2025-04-29

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

PROCEDURE

cold snare polypectomy

Cold snare polypectomy was conducted for the removal of 4-10 mm pedunculated colorectal polyps.

PROCEDURE

hot snare polypectomy

Hot snare polypectomy was conducted for the removal of 4-10 mm pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Locations (1)

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Jinan, Shandong, China