Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Preservation Vs. Dissection of No. 253 Lymph Nodes of Robotic Resection for Mid/Low Rectal Cancer
Sponsor: Fudan University
Summary
In this study, patients with middle or low rectal cancer will receive robotic radical resection, and will be randomly assigned to receive inferior mesenteric artery lymph nodes dissection or preservation. The 3-year disease-free survival rates of these two surgical approaches will be compared.
Official title: Preservation Versus Dissection of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Lymph Nodes of Robotic Radical Resection for Mid/Low Rectal Cancer (REAL2): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 80 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
1596
Start Date
2025-06-01
Completion Date
2031-06-01
Last Updated
2025-05-04
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Dissection of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Root Lymph Node
Patients underwent robotic radical resection for rectal cancer, adhering to the principles of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) or Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision (TSME), and dissecting the lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).
Preservation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Root Lymph Node
Patients underwent robotic radical resection for rectal cancer, adhering to the principles of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) or Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision (TSME), but preserving the lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).
Locations (1)
Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China