Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Pacritinib vs. Hydroxyurea in Advanced Proliferative Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Sponsor: Theradex
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if pacritinib works better than hydroxyurea to treat advanced proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in adults. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does pacritinib improve disease control compared to hydroxyurea? * What medical problems do participants have when taking pacritinib or hydroxyurea? Researchers will compare pacritinib to hydroxyurea to see if pacritinib is more effective and better tolerated in people with advanced proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either pacritinib twice a day or hydroxyurea for up to 48 weeks. After treatment ends, participants will be followed for up to one year.
Official title: A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Pacritinib vs. Hydroxyurea in Patients With Advanced Proliferative Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
66
Start Date
2026-01-01
Completion Date
2028-12
Last Updated
2026-08-18
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Pacritinib
100-mg capsules
Hydroxyurea
capsules or tablets
Locations (6)
Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, United States
Winship Cancer Institute at Emory
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust
London, Greater London, United Kingdom
The Christie, NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom