Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Physician Response Evaluation With Contextual Insights vs. Standard Engines - Artificial Intelligence RAG vs LLM Clinical Decision Support
Sponsor: Montefiore Medical Center
Summary
Clinical decision support tools powered by artificial intelligence (AI) are being rapidly integrated into medical practice. Two leading systems currently available to clinicians are OpenEvidence, which uses retrieval-augmented generation to access medical literature, and GPT-4, a large language model. While both tools show promise, their relative effectiveness in supporting clinical decision-making has not been directly compared. This study aims to evaluate how these tools influence diagnostic reasoning and management decisions among internal medicine physicians.
Official title: Comparing OpenEvidence and GPT-4 for Diagnostic Reasoning and Management Decisions: A Randomized Trial
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
25 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
41
Start Date
2025-07-03
Completion Date
2025-12-30
Last Updated
2026-08-11
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
OpenEvidence
Medical information platform which uses retrieval-augmented generation to access medical literature
GPT-4
A chatbot application developed that uses GPT-4, a large language model, to engage in conversational interactions with users.
Locations (2)
Harvard Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
MontefioreMC
The Bronx, New York, United States