Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING
NCT07047131
PHASE3

Resorbable vs Non-resorbable Bone Substitute at Immediate Post-extractive Single Implants

Sponsor: Marco Esposito

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This study compares two bone graft materials used when placing a dental implant right after tooth removal. One graft fully dissolves (GTO®), the other only partly (Apatos®). The goal is to see which one better preserves bone and improves appearance around the implant.

Official title: A Resorbable Versus a Non-resorbable Bone Substitute at Immediate Post-extractive Single Implants Immediately Loaded: a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

50

Start Date

2018-12-18

Completion Date

2030-12-20

Last Updated

2025-07-04

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

BIOLOGICAL

GTO® (fully resorbable bone substitute)

Collagenated heterologous cortico-cancellous porcine bone mix + thermogelling copolymer with collagen (GTO®, OsteoBiol®, Tecnoss®)

BIOLOGICAL

Apatos® (partially resorbable bone substitute)

Porcine cortical bone granules (Apatos Cortical®, OsteoBiol®, Tecnoss®) stabilized with TSV Gel®, a thermogelling copolymer with collagen.

Locations (1)

King Juan Carlos University

Madrid, Madrid, Spain