Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT07071870
NA

RCT on the Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive SAIF Technique vs Spinal Fixation in Unstable Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

Sponsor: Eva Koetsier MD PhD

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) represent a significant cause of morbidity, mortality, decreased level of function and quality of life. The most severe OVFs are unstable and in these cases surgical stabilization, with various techniques, is considered necessary to restore the physiological loading capacity of the spine, and allow fast and painless mobilization. Unfortunately, the elderly, osteoporotic patient population poses serious challenges to spinal surgery, due to tissue frailty and frequent comorbidities. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the SAIF intervention in comparison with multilevel surgical stabilization in participants with unstable OVFs.

Official title: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial Comparing Minimally Invasive SAIF Vertebral Reconstruction Technique Versus Spinal Fixation in Unstable Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

50 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

140

Start Date

2026-01-01

Completion Date

2029-12-31

Last Updated

2025-07-17

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Stent-screw Assisted Internal Fixation (SAIF)

Implanting vertebral body stents (VBS), followed by insertion of percutaneous, fenestrated, cement-augmented pedicular screws

PROCEDURE

Surgical stabilization

Spinal fixation with cement augmented pedicle screws bridging the fractured vertebra

Locations (1)

EOC Lugano

Lugano, Canton Ticino, Switzerland