Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT07082023
NA

Comparison of V-NOTES and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy Techniques

Sponsor: Havva Betül Bacak

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes, safety profiles, and patient satisfaction between two minimally invasive techniques for pelvic organ prolapse repair: Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES) mesh-free sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic mesh-free sacrocolpopexy. By evaluating perioperative data, complication rates, anatomical and functional outcomes, this trial seeks to determine whether the V-NOTES approach provides comparable or superior results to the traditional laparoscopic technique, without the use of synthetic mesh.

Official title: Comparison of V-NOTES (Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery) Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy

Key Details

Gender

FEMALE

Age Range

18 Years - 75 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

52

Start Date

2025-07-01

Completion Date

2026-01-01

Last Updated

2025-07-24

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

PROCEDURE

V-NOTES Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy

Mesh-free sacrocolpopexy performed via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES).

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy

Mesh-free sacrocolpopexy performed via conventional laparoscopy.

Locations (1)

Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)