Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Comparison of V-NOTES and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy Techniques
Sponsor: Havva Betül Bacak
Summary
This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes, safety profiles, and patient satisfaction between two minimally invasive techniques for pelvic organ prolapse repair: Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES) mesh-free sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic mesh-free sacrocolpopexy. By evaluating perioperative data, complication rates, anatomical and functional outcomes, this trial seeks to determine whether the V-NOTES approach provides comparable or superior results to the traditional laparoscopic technique, without the use of synthetic mesh.
Official title: Comparison of V-NOTES (Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery) Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy
Key Details
Gender
FEMALE
Age Range
18 Years - 75 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
52
Start Date
2025-07-01
Completion Date
2026-01-01
Last Updated
2025-07-24
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
V-NOTES Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy
Mesh-free sacrocolpopexy performed via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES).
Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy
Mesh-free sacrocolpopexy performed via conventional laparoscopy.
Locations (1)
Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)