Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT07093853

Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Four Locator Attachments Versus Four-Implant Bar Attachments

Sponsor: Menoufia University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This 10-year retrospective study investigates residual ridge changes in edentulous patients treated with mandibular overdentures (ODs) retained by either four Locator attachments or a four-implant bar system. Although two-implant ODs are well established, four-implant configurations may offer enhanced stability and function. Locator and bar attachments are commonly used, but their long-term effects on bone resorption patterns-especially posterior mandibular and anterior maxillary resorption-remain unclear. By standardizing implant positions, this study aims to directly compare the two systems to help guide clinicians in selecting the most effective attachment type for long-term success.

Official title: Residual Ridge Changes in Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Four Locator Attachments Versus Four-Implant Bar Attachments: A 10-Year Retrospective Study

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

40 Years - 70 Years

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

22

Start Date

2024-01-01

Completion Date

2025-10-01

Last Updated

2025-07-30

Healthy Volunteers

Not specified

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

Four Locator Attachments, Four Bar Attachment System

This study retrospectively evaluated two types of implant-retained mandibular overdenture attachment systems placed in edentulous patients over a 10-year period. All patients received four dental implants placed in the interforaminal region (lateral incisor and first premolar areas). In the Locator group, each implant was restored with an individual Locator attachment, allowing for independent retention and easier hygiene access. In the Bar group, the four implants were splinted together with a rigid metal bar, and the overdenture was attached using clips that engaged the bar, offering splinted support and enhanced load distribution. Both interventions were designed to support mandibular overdentures and were compared in terms of their long-term effects on posterior mandibular ridge resorption, marginal bone loss around implants, and anterior maxillary ridge resorption.

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry

Al Mansurah, Menoufia, Egypt