Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Assessment of Pain and Anxiety During Infiltration Anesthesia Using Dental Anesthesia Injector Versus Conventional Syringe in Pediatric Patients
Sponsor: Ain Shams University
Summary
This randomized controlled trial is conducted on pediatric dental patients to compare the effectiveness of local anesthesia administered using a dental anesthesia injector device versus the traditional syringe method. The study aims to assess and compare pain and anxiety levels associated with both methods, using both subjective (self-reported) and objective measures. The goal is to identify an alternative technique that minimizes pain and anxiety in pediatric dental patients.
Official title: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess Pain and Anxiety During Infiltration Anesthesia Using Dental Anesthesia Injector Versus Conventional Syringe in Pediatric Patients
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
6 Years - 8 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
40
Start Date
2024-01-25
Completion Date
2025-10-01
Last Updated
2025-08-03
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
Dental Anesthesia Injector
Topical anesthesia lidocain for 1 minute will be applied on previously dried mucosa. Local anesthesia administration( artican 4% +1/100,000 With extra short needles 30G-10mm ) using Dental Anesthesia Injector.
conventional syringe
Topical anesthesia lidocain for 1 minute will be applied on previously dried mucosa. Local anesthesia administration( artican 4% +1/100,000 With extra short needles 30G-10mm ) using conventional syringe
Locations (2)
Ain Shams University
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
Faculty of dentistry, Ain Shams University
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt