Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Hybrid Osteoplasty Versus Osteotomy in Rhinoplasty
Sponsor: University of Sulaimani
Summary
This study is designed to compare two common techniques for reducing the nasal hump during rhinoplasty: the traditional method using osteotomes and rasps, and a newer technique called hybrid osteoplasty that uses a surgical drill. Both approaches aim to improve the appearance and function of the nose. The trial will measure pain, swelling, bruising, and the smoothness of the nasal bridge, as well as patient satisfaction and breathing outcomes. Participants will be followed for one year to assess both early healing and long-term results.
Official title: Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes Following Hybrid Osteoplasty Versus Traditional Osteotomy in Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
200
Start Date
2025-10-01
Completion Date
2026-12-01
Last Updated
2025-10-02
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Hybrid Osteoplasty
Open rhinoplasty with dorsal hump reduction performed using a powered surgical burr under irrigation and direct visualization. Bone is contoured gradually to achieve a smooth dorsum while preserving the keystone area. No dorsal osteotomy is performed in this arm. Cartilaginous work and adjunctive steps (e.g., septoplasty or tip refinement) are performed as clinically indicated but are not part of the intervention being tested.
Traditional Osteotomy and Rasping
Open rhinoplasty using the conventional technique for dorsal hump reduction. The bony hump is resected with a straight osteotome, followed by manual rasping to refine the nasal dorsum, with preservation of the keystone area. Powered burrs are not used for primary dorsal contouring in this arm. Cartilaginous work and adjunctive procedures may be performed as clinically indicated but are not part of the tested intervention.
Locations (1)
Royal Hospital
Sulaymaniyah, KRI, Iraq