Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING
NCT07154277
PHASE2/PHASE3

Small Bites Vs Large Bites Abdominal Midline Incisional Closure

Sponsor: Dow University of Health Sciences

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The goal of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of small bite versus large bite abdominal incision closure in emergency settings. It will also evaluate the safety and outcomes of each technique. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does small bite closure reduce the incidence of superficial surgical site infections (SSI), wound dehiscence, and incisional hernia compared to large bite closure? What are the associated complications of each closure technique? Participants will: Undergo either a small bite or large bite abdominal incision closure during emergency laparotomy Visit the clinic for follow-up assessments at 7 days, 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively Have their wound healing and complications documented and analyzed during respective visits.

Official title: Abdominal Midline Incisional Closure With Small Bites Vs Large Bites in Emergency Settings

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 60 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

200

Start Date

2023-11-23

Completion Date

2025-12-24

Last Updated

2025-09-04

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Small bite closure

Small bite suturing is small tissue bite of 0.5cm depth x 0.5cm travel x 0.5cm apart, on the aponeurosis away from midline using Prolene 2/0

PROCEDURE

Large bite closure

Large bite closure is defined as tissue bite of 1cm depth x 1 cm travel x 1cm apart, on the aponeurosis away from midline using Prolene 0

Locations (1)

Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi

Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan