Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Prosthetic Modality and MBL
Sponsor: Studio Odontoiatrico Associato Dr. P. Cicchese e L. Canullo
Summary
The present study will test the effect of different prosthetic modalities on conical and internal hex connection implants, assessing the radiographic MBL changes after one year. Consecutive patients fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria will enter the study. Once the implant is inserted, patients will be divided into three groups according to the time if their inclusion in the study. Study groups (20 patients per group): 1. Group 1: Placing Lance Conical implant with a healing abutment. Three months later, after an impression, a screw-retained restoration will be seated using a Ti-Base abutment. 2. Group 2: Placing Lance+ (Internal Hex connection) implant with a healing abutment. Three months later, after an impression, a screw-retained restoration will be seated using a Ti-Base abutment. 3. Group 3: Placing Lance Conical implant together with Connect Abutment (tightened to 30 Ncm) with a Connect healing cap ("one time one abutment"). Screw retained restoration after 3 months. Consecutive inclusion of patients - 1st- group 1, 2nd - group 2, 3rd - group 3 and vice versa. Primary outcome variable: bone level changes 12 months post-loading
Official title: The Effect of Prosthetic Modality on Bone Level Changes During One-Year Follow-Up
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
60
Start Date
2025-09-01
Completion Date
2026-12-31
Last Updated
2025-09-04
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
Traditional prosthetic procedure
Three months later, after an impression, haling abutment will be removed and a screw-retained restoration will be seated using a Ti-Base abutment.
one abutment-one time
Three months later, after an impression, a screw-retained restoration will be seated directly on the connect healing
Locations (1)
Studi Odontoiatrici Luigi Canullo
Roma, RM, Italy