Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT07162792
NA

The Safety and Efficacy of New-Generation BRS vs. DCB for De Novo Large Coronary Artery Lesions: A Prospective RCT

Sponsor: Xuzhou Third People's Hospital

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This study plans to enroll 150 patients who are candidates for "intervention without implantation" therapy and they will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the new-generation Firesorb scaffold group (BRS group, N=75) or the drug-coated balloon group (DCB group, N=75). All enrolled patients will undergo angiographic follow-up at 1 year post-procedure, and serial follow-up (via telephone or outpatient visit) will be performed at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years post-procedure. The primary study endpoint was percentage diameter stenosis at 1 year post-procedure.

Official title: The Safety and Efficacy of New-Generation Bioabsorbable Scaffolds Versus Drug-Coated Balloons in the Treatment of De Novo Lesions in Large Coronary Arteries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 80 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

150

Start Date

2025-10-23

Completion Date

2028-12-30

Last Updated

2025-09-09

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DEVICE

bioresorbable scaffold

75 subjects with de novo large vessel coronary lesions who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were enrolled; subjects were assigned to the treatment group of BRS.

DEVICE

drug-coated balloon

75 subjects with de novo large vessel coronary lesions who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were enrolled; subjects were assigned to the treatment group of DCB.