Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Cannulated Bone Bolt® Screw System Versus Standard Cannulated Screw System Fixation for Pelvic Fractures
Sponsor: University of Utah
Summary
The investigators aim is to determine if the cannulated Bone Bolt® screw system will provide improved post-operative pain control as compared to standard cannulated screw system fixation for the operative treatment of LC1 fractures (primary outcome). Hypothesis: Patients treated with the cannulated Bone Bolt® screw system will experience a clinically important difference (1.5 points) in post-operative pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) compared to patients treated with standard cannulated screw system fixation.
Official title: Cannulated Bone Bolt® Screw System Versus Standard Cannulated Screw System Fixation for Lateral Compression Type-1 (LC-1) Pelvic Ring Injuries: Multicenter Prospective Observational Study
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 80 Years
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
100
Start Date
2025-06-11
Completion Date
2028-06
Last Updated
2025-10-06
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Cannulated Bone Bolt® Screw System
Patients treated with the Cannulated Bone Bolt® screw system for Lateral Compression Type -1 (LC-1) fractures.
Standard Cannulated Screw System
Patients treated with the Standard Cannulated Screw System for Lateral Compression Type -1 (LC-1) fractures.
Locations (1)
University of Utah Orthopedics
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States