Clinical Research Directory

Optimising Pacing Therapy, Integrated Medical Therapy, and Catheter AbLation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Trial

Sponsor: University of British Columbia

Summary

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Heart Failure (HF) are colliding global cardiovascular epidemics, individually impairing quality of life and cardiac performance, as well as increasing the risk of hospitalisation and mortality. When AF and HF co-exist, disease progression accelerates and the adverse outcomes are magnified, leading to incrementally higher morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure. The management of AF has been dichotomised into the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm ("Rhythm control") or acceptance of AF with control of the ventricular response ("Rate control"). Previous studies suggested that pharmacologic rhythm control and pharmacologic rate control confer similar survival and morbidity outcomes in patients with significant left ventricular dysfunction. Recognising the limitations of pharmacotherapy, more recent studies have examined the utility of catheter ablation procedures, either designed to restore and maintain sinus rhythm (e.g., catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation) or control the ventricular response (e.g., pacemaker implantation in combination with catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction). Compared to pharmacotherapy, these studies have suggested that catheter ablation may provide sustained improvements in quality of life, decreased hospitalisation and, potentially, improved survival for patients with co-existing AF and HF. However, these studies were performed prior to the modern era of quadruple LV enhancing therapy (beta-blocker, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and an SGLT2 inhibitor). The true impact of catheter-based interventions, and thus the optimal management of AF for patients with co-existing HF is not known. The investigators propose a randomised controlled trial to definitively answer the question regarding the optimal invasive treatment of AF in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF - LVEF ≤ 40%).

Key Details

Conditions

Interventions