Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT07250139
NA

Comparative Study of Ziplyft Treatment vs. Traditional Blepharoplasty for Upper Eyelid Rejuvenation

Sponsor: Osheru Inc.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This study will compare two surgery techniques used for upper eyelid (eyelift) surgery: traditional surgery and a newer method called Ziplyft (a non-powered, hand-held clamp). This study will use a "split-face" design, meaning one eyelid will be treated with the traditional surgery method and the other with Ziplyft, allowing a direct side-by-side comparison. The objectives of the study are to compare Ziplyft treatment vs. traditional surgery by evaluating bruising, wound closure and incision, surgery case time, and subject/surgeon surveys.

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

35 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

50

Start Date

2025-12-08

Completion Date

2026-09-30

Last Updated

2025-11-26

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DEVICE

Ziplyft Device

Ziplyft will be used on one side of the participant's face to compress the excess skin prior to excess eyelid skin removal. Ziplyft compresses the excess skin and seals it together, no suturing is required, and the surgery incision will be closed with tissue adhesive.

OTHER

Comparator Arm: Standard Blepharoplasty

Standard blepharoplasty will be used on the fellow side of the participant's face. Standard blepharoplasty uses a blade, cautery to seal blood vessels, and sutures to close the incision.

Locations (1)

New Century Ophthalmology

Oxford, North Carolina, United States