Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT07323615
NA

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Methods in the Treatment of Skin Wounds

Sponsor: Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This study will compare the experimental group (debridement assisted by surgical microscope + VSD) and the control group (debridement under naked-eye observation + VSD) in terms of the rate of change in BWAT scores at one week postoperatively when the VSD is removed, daily wound negative-pressure drainage volume and pain scores within the first postoperative week, and results of two wound bacterial cultures. The study aims to scientifically evaluate the difference in efficacy between microscope-assisted debridement and naked-eye debridement, with the goal of providing a reference for the clinical debridement treatment of skin wounds.

Official title: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Naked-Eye Observation Versus Microscopic Magnification Observation in the Treatment of Skin Wounds

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 99 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

98

Start Date

2025-12-16

Completion Date

2027-01-31

Last Updated

2026-01-07

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DEVICE

microscopic

debridement with surgical microscope