Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT07353255
NA

Fibrescope vs Videolaryngoscope for Nasotracheal Intubation

Sponsor: University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Patients having surgery under general anaesthesia require insertion of a breathing tube to keep the airway open. The technique of inserting a breathing tube through the nose into the trachea (airway) is known as nasotracheal intubation. This is the ideal airway for surgical procedures performed inside the mouth, such as complex teeth extractions and operations on the jaw. Traditionally, the breathing tube is initially inserted blindly into the nasal cavity. Then, a video laryngoscope (a camera device) or a direct laryngoscope is used to visualise and guide the passage of tube into the trachea. This approach can be associated with difficulty passing the tube and has a high incidence of nasal trauma and nosebleed. Alternatively, a flexible fibrescope ( flexible camera device) with pre-loaded tracheal tube is passed through the nostril first under vision, gently advanced through the nasal passage and then to the trachea. Once it is correctly placed in the trachea, the breathing tube is railroaded over it. This procedure allows the clinician to visualise the nasal passage and to choose most patent nostril and hence is likely to reduce risk of nosebleed as compared blind passage of tube through the nose. A videolaryngoscope has a camera on the blade that projects the image onto a monitor screen. As this is a rigid device, it can only be inserted through the oral cavity and allows the advancement of tube into the trachea. Both these techniques are currently used in the clinical practice. However, there are no studies to inform anaesthetists whether there are any differences in the incidence of nosebleed. The investigators therefore wish to do a randomised comparison between flexible fibrescope and videolaryngocope to assess if use of the former is associated with any reduced risk or severity of nosebleed.

Official title: Flexible Fibrescope Versus Video Laryngoscope for Nasotracheal Intubation - A Randomised Comparison

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

200

Start Date

2026-02-01

Completion Date

2027-01-31

Last Updated

2026-06-15

Healthy Volunteers

No

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Nasotracheal Intubation with Fibrescope

Intubation of trachea via nasal route with Fibrescope (11302BDX Flex. Intubation Video Endoscope 4 x 65 Karl Storz)

PROCEDURE

Nasotracheal Intubation with Video laryngoscope

Intubation of trachea via nasal route using a videolaryngoscope (301-000-000 McGRATH™ with Mac Blade)

Locations (1)

University Hospital Coventry

Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom