Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Magnetic Mallet Vs Conventional Drilling in D4 Posterior Maxilla
Sponsor: University of Mosul
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the magnetic mallet technique improves primary implant stability and clinical outcomes compared with conventional drilling during dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla with soft bone quality. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the magnetic mallet technique result in higher primary implant stability compared with conventional drilling? Does the magnetic mallet technique reduce surgical trauma and related complications compared with conventional drilling? Researchers will compare the magnetic mallet technique with conventional drilling to determine differences in implant stability, bone response, and clinical outcomes. Participants will: Undergo dental implant placement using either the magnetic mallet technique or conventional drilling. Be clinically and radiographically evaluated for implant stability and postoperative outcomes during follow-up
Official title: Clinical Comparative Analysis of Magnetic Mallet and Conventional Drilling Techniques for Implant Placement in D4 Bone: A Prospective Study
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
20 Years - 60 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
30
Start Date
2025-11-01
Completion Date
2026-07-01
Last Updated
2026-02-27
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Interventions
Conventional drilling osteotomy
implant site preparation using sequential rotary drills according to standard protocol.
Magnetic mallet osteotomy
Implant site preparation using controlled electromagnetic impulses for bone condensation.
Locations (1)
University of Mosul/ College of Dentistry
Mosul, Mosul, Iraq