Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Sites Groups Studies

Back to Studies

NOT YET RECRUITING

NCT07441382

Catheter Ablation Plus LAAO Versus Anticoagulation in Frail Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Sponsor: Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, significantly increasing the risk of stroke, heart failure, hospitalization and death in patients. Studies have shown that standardized anticoagulation can effectively reduce the risk of stroke by 64% and the risk of death by 26% in AF patients. Therefore, both European and American guidelines recommend standardized oral anticoagulation (OAC) as an important treatment strategy for stroke prevention in AF patients. However, the use of OAC may also increase the risk of bleeding in patients. Results from large AF anticoagulation randomized trials show that the annual risk of anticoagulation-related bleeding mortality is 2% to 3%. Therefore, according to the guidelines recommendations, assessing the bleeding risk is necessary in patients with anticoagulant indications. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a device-based therapy that aims to prevent ischemic stroke in patients with AF. For patients with contraindications to long-term anticoagulation therapy, LAAO can be considered as an alternative strategy to oral anticoagulation (Class II B recommendation) to prevent ischemic stroke and thromboembolism. Multiple studies have shown that LAAO is non-inferior to warfarin and novel oral anticoagulants in stroke prevention for non-valvular AF patients. Age is not only a risk factor for stroke but also an important risk factor for bleeding. In the elderly population, especially those with frailty, the risk factors for both stroke and bleeding are often increased. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of OAC in frail elderly patients with relative anticoagulant contraindications. Therefore, elderly AF patients may be one of the potential beneficiary groups for LAAO. However, most previous clinical studies on LAAO were based on small sample sizes to analyze their safety and efficacy, and clinical data on the safety and efficacy of LAAO in this high-risk population of elderly AF patients are still limited. To address this, the study aims to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation combined with LAAO versus catheter ablation combined with OAC in elderly AF patients with high bleeding risk, filling the gap in this research area. To address these limitations, this multicenter randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation combined with LAAO versus catheter ablation combined with OAC in elderly AF patients at high risk for bleeding. The primary objective of the study is to compare the 12-month incidence and time-to-occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint. This endpoint includes stroke/TIA, systemic embolism, ISTH-defined major bleeding. By establishing these metrics within the first year, the study aims to fill the current void in clinical evidence and provide a standardized treatment strategy for high-risk elderly patients. In addition to the primary endpoints, the study will conduct a comprehensive long-term evaluation extending to 24 months post-procedure to assess the durability of both treatment strategies. Secondary objectives include the assessment of perioperative safety, specifically focusing on serious intraoperative complications and major adverse events occurring within the first seven days after the LAAO procedure. The trial will also measure long-term rhythm control by tracking the rate of freedom from AF recurrence at the one-year and two-year marks. Furthermore, the study seeks to verify the hypothesized superiority of the ablation-plus-LAAO strategy in reducing the specific burden of anticoagulation-related major bleeding and stroke. Beyond clinical safety and efficacy, the trial will analyze the practical aspects of the two interventions, including procedural success rates, operation duration, fluoroscopy time, and the total duration of hospitalization. A critical component of the research involves identifying specific risk factors associated with complications, with a specialized focus on how frailty scores influence procedural tolerance and long-term prognosis. The study will further explore how different types of AF respond to the LAAO strategy and assess the impact of each treatment on non-major bleeding events. Ultimately, the trial aims to determine which strategy offers a superior improvement in the overall quality of life for elderly patients, thereby optimizing future clinical guidelines.

Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial - Catheter Ablation Combined With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Catheter Ablation Combined With Oral Anticoagulation for Elderly Frailty Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

75 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

200

Start Date

2026-03-01

Completion Date

2028-03-01

Last Updated

2026-03-02

Healthy Volunteers

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation (AF)Stroke Hemorrhage Frailty Atrial Appendage Catheter Ablation Anticoagulants

Interventions

DEVICE

catheter ablation combined with LAAO (Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion)

1. Ablation: CPVI will be performed using the EnSite X system and HD Grid catheter. Additional linear ablation (e.g., mitral isthmus or roof lines) may be added based on the patient's atrial substrate if sinus rhythm is not restored. LAAO: An LAA closure device (Watchman FLX, LAmbre, or LACbes) will be implanted under TEE or ICE guidance. 2. Antithrombotic Regimen: Days 0-90: Participants receive OAC (NOAC or Warfarin). Day 90 to 12 Months: If imaging confirms no DRT and no residual leak ≥ 5 mm, therapy will be de-escalated (e.g., to aspirin monotherapy) at the investigator's discretion.

DRUG

Atrial Fibrillation Radiofrequency Ablation Only

Atrial Fibrillation Radiofrequency Ablation: Procedures will be performed using the EnSite X 3D mapping system with an HD Grid high-density mapping catheter for atrial modeling, followed by pulmonary vein isolation using any approved ablation catheter. Linear ablation may be added if necessary. Guideline-directed oral anticoagulation (e.g., NOACs or warfarin) will be continued post-procedure.

Inclusion Criteria: (1) Age ≥ 75 years. (2) Confirmed diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal or persistent). (3) CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 3 (high risk of stroke) . (4) Procedure-related criteria: Sequential Group: Participants who have received catheter ablation for non-valvular AF within 90 to 180 days prior to randomization. One-stop Group: Participants who are scheduled to undergo clinically indicated catheter ablation within 10 days after randomization. (5) Judged by the investigator to be able to tolerate the defined antithrombotic drug regimen. (6) Suitable to undergo Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) or Pulmonary Vein Computed Tomography (CT). (7) Able and willing to sign the written informed consent form. (8) Willing to return for all scheduled follow-up visits and examinations. Exclusion Criteria: (1) Presence of thrombus in the left atrium or left atrial appendage identified on preoperative imaging (echocardiogram, pulmonary vein CT, etc). (2) Major bleeding event (per ISTH definition) within 14 days prior to randomization. Participants must be excluded if clinical sequelae persist or if interventions for the bleeding source are planned/pending, regardless of the time elapsed since the event. (3) Requirement for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) for reasons other than stroke risk reduction in AF (e.g., underlying hypercoagulable state) that would prevent OAC discontinuation post-device implantation. (4) Any cardiac or major non-cardiac intervention/surgery (excluding AF ablation and cardioversion) performed within 30 days prior to, or scheduled within 60 days after randomization. This includes but is not limited to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or other cardiac ablations. (5) Life expectancy \< 2 years, malignancy, infectious endocarditis, uncontrolled infection, or physiological evidence of cardiac tamponade. (6) Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 1-3 (not frail) or 7-9 (severely frail/terminally ill). (7) Deemed unsuitable for long-term anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet therapy by the investigator due to bleeding risk, allergies, or other reasons. (8) Current participation in another clinical trial that interferes with this study, excluding mandatory government or purely observational registries. (9) Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 60 days prior to randomization. (10) Documented myocardial infarction (NSTEMI or STEMI) within 90 days prior to randomization, regardless of intervention. (11) History of atrial septal defect (ASD) repair or presence of an ASD/Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) occluder. (12) Presence of a mechanical prosthetic valve in any position. (13) Participants of childbearing potential who are pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study period. (14) Medical or anatomical contraindications to percutaneous catheter-based interventions. (15) Documented NYHA Class IV heart failure. (16) History of surgical left atrial appendage (LAA) closure. Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE) Specific Exclusions: (1) Low LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 30%. (2) Presence of pericardial effusion with a circumferential echo-free space \> 5mm. (3) Presence of high-risk PFO associated with an atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) with an excursion or length \> 15mm. (4) Presence of high-risk PFO with a large shunt (defined as appearance of microbubbles within 3 cardiac cycles and/or a substantial count of microbubbles). (5) Presence of moderate or severe mitral stenosis (mitral valve area \< 1.5 cm2).

Locations (1)

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China