Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
FANS vs Standard Ureteral Access Sheath in fURS
Sponsor: IRCCS San Raffaele
Summary
This is a prospective, interventional single blinded, randomized, single-center study designed to compare the efficacy of a ureteral access sheath with integrated suction (FANS) versus a standard ureteral access sheath (UAS) in patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy for renal stones. The hypothesis is that the use of the FANS device improves stone-free rates and reduces postoperative infectious complications compared to the standard sheath.
Official title: Comparative Study on the Efficacy of the Ureteral Access Sheath With Integrated Suction FANS Versus the Standard Sheath in Patients With Renal Calculi Undergoing Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Lithotripsy: a Prospective, Randomized, Interventional, Single-center Study
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
134
Start Date
2026-03-15
Completion Date
2029-01
Last Updated
2026-03-12
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Standard ureteral access sheath
Participants undergo flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy using a standard ureteral access sheath according to institutional practice.
Flexible and Navigable Suction (FANS) Ureteral Access Sheath
The Flexible and Navigable Suction (FANS) ureteral access sheath (Elephant-II), which enables active suction during flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy.
Locations (1)
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, Italy