Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT07463833
NA

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Enhanced Pretreatment Peer-review Process to Improve Patient Safety in Radiation Oncology

Sponsor: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This prospective study will test artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) decision support tools. This tool is designed to help doctors, physicists and other staff during pre-treatment peer review, a step where treatment plans are checked before a patient begins care. The system highlights summaries showing how different providers may vary in their treatment planning (provider-variability summaries) and points out the best signals or warning signs to look for (optimal cues). By drawing attention to these patterns and cues, the tool aims to help reviewers spot possible treatment-planning mistakes earlier, reduce the chance of errors, and improve overall patient safety.

Official title: Development and Assessment of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Enhanced Pretreatment Peer-review Process to Improve Patient Safety in Radiation Oncology

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

207

Start Date

2026-07

Completion Date

2027-07

Last Updated

2026-04-07

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Interventions

DEVICE

The Artificial Intelligence (AI)/ Machine Learning (ML) contribution to treatment planning

All treatment planning and clinical monitoring are conducted in accordance with institutional standards and established departmental policies. Peer review activities proceed as they would in routine clinical practice, with the addition of optional Artificial Intelligence (AI) generated analytics available for clinician review. AI / Machine Learning (ML) system is embedded in scheduled departmental peer review meetings and presents analytic summaries and visualizations through a dashboard that is integrated into the existing clinical workflow. The system functions solely as a decision support aid and does not perform or initiate any autonomous treatment planning actions, dose delivery changes, or clinical interventions. During simulation (SIM) review, physician generated target and organ at risk contours are reviewed first, consistent with standard practice. Only after this initial review may the treating physician optionally access the AI generated contours for comparative purposes.

Locations (1)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Radiation Oncology

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States