Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Pain Randomized Controlled Trial: the PAcStim RCT
Sponsor: University Health Network, Toronto
Summary
Neuropathic pain affects 6-10% of the global population and is poorly managed - current drug treatments succeed in only \~25% of patients. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) modulates pain by electrically stimulating spinal dorsal column fibres. The newer paresthesia-free mode (PF-SCS, 500-10,000 Hz) appears more effective and tolerable than traditional paresthesia-based SCS, with superior outcomes shown in the SENZA-RCT. All promising PF-SCS studies have been unblinded, making them susceptible to placebo effects. The one blinded RCT that exists had significant methodological flaws (no washout period, single baseline measurement) that biased results toward the null. A blinded, multi-centre, crossover RCT in 90 patients comparing 6 weeks of active PF-SCS vs. 6 weeks of placebo stimulation, with a 2-week washout in between - designed to correct the flaws of the prior trial and definitively establish whether PF-SCS works beyond placebo.
Official title: Placebo Versus Active Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Pain Randomized Controlled Trial: the PAcStim RCT
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
90
Start Date
2026-04-01
Completion Date
2027-04-01
Last Updated
2026-03-12
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Paresthesia-free spinal cord stimulation
At the beginning of the PF-SCS phase, the unblinded trial nurse will set the stimulator to provide active stimulation \[500-1200 Hz at 70% of the perception amplitude - usually between 3 to 5 mA\], which will remain constant for the 6-week duration of this period.