Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT07468591
NA

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Pain Randomized Controlled Trial: the PAcStim RCT

Sponsor: University Health Network, Toronto

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Neuropathic pain affects 6-10% of the global population and is poorly managed - current drug treatments succeed in only \~25% of patients. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) modulates pain by electrically stimulating spinal dorsal column fibres. The newer paresthesia-free mode (PF-SCS, 500-10,000 Hz) appears more effective and tolerable than traditional paresthesia-based SCS, with superior outcomes shown in the SENZA-RCT. All promising PF-SCS studies have been unblinded, making them susceptible to placebo effects. The one blinded RCT that exists had significant methodological flaws (no washout period, single baseline measurement) that biased results toward the null. A blinded, multi-centre, crossover RCT in 90 patients comparing 6 weeks of active PF-SCS vs. 6 weeks of placebo stimulation, with a 2-week washout in between - designed to correct the flaws of the prior trial and definitively establish whether PF-SCS works beyond placebo.

Official title: Placebo Versus Active Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Pain Randomized Controlled Trial: the PAcStim RCT

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

90

Start Date

2026-04-01

Completion Date

2027-04-01

Last Updated

2026-03-12

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DEVICE

Paresthesia-free spinal cord stimulation

At the beginning of the PF-SCS phase, the unblinded trial nurse will set the stimulator to provide active stimulation \[500-1200 Hz at 70% of the perception amplitude - usually between 3 to 5 mA\], which will remain constant for the 6-week duration of this period.