Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Trigger Fingers: Longitudinal Opening Versus Complete A1 Pulley Release
Sponsor: Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Summary
Trigger finger is a pathology of the flexor tendons caused by inflammation of the tendon or its sheath, leading to pain, nodules, fibrosis, and limited mobility. Surgical treatment aims to release the space at the level of the A1 pulley, either through longitudinal opening (the standard technique, but associated with recurrence rates of approximately 7.7%) or through complete resection, an emerging approach that may reduce recurrences and the need for reoperations. However, comparative data remain limited, justifying further investigation. This project therefore aims to compare these two surgical techniques to determine which one results in the lowest recurrence rate and to assess their functional outcomes (pain, range of motion). The primary hypothesis is that A1 pulley resection reduces recurrences after one year, while the secondary hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in postoperative pain or mobility.
Official title: Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Trigger Fingers: Longitudinal Opening Versus Complete A1 Pulley Release.
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
236
Start Date
2026-04-01
Completion Date
2029-04-01
Last Updated
2026-03-31
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Longitudinal incision
A longitudinal incision of the A1 pulley performed to open the pulley, thereby reducing the pressure on the inflamed tendon and facilitating its gliding during finger movements.
Complete resection
Fully removing the pulley in order to eliminate friction between the tendon and its fibrous band