Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT07509359
NA

Comparing Basilic and Cephalic Vein Approaches for Midline Catheter Placement in Children

Sponsor: Seoul National University Hospital

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare basilic vein and cephalic vein approaches for midline catheter placement in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia. Participants aged 2 to 17 years who require midline catheter insertion will be randomly assigned 1:1 to either the basilic vein group or the cephalic vein group. The primary outcome is the clinical blood sampling success rate during the catheter dwell period, defined as successful aspiration of ≥2 mL of blood through the midline catheter at least once without additional venipuncture. Secondary outcomes include operator-rated difficulty, number of puncture attempts, first attempt cannulation success rate, vein diameter and depth, catheter dwell time, catheter-related complications, and patient satisfaction. A total of 96 participants (48 per arm) will be enrolled at Seoul National University Children's Hospital.

Official title: Comparing Basilic and Cephalic Vein Approaches for Midline Catheter Placement in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

2 Years - 17 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

96

Start Date

2026-04-01

Completion Date

2030-04-01

Last Updated

2026-04-03

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Midline catheter placement via basilic vein

Midline catheter placement via basilic vein under ultrasound guidance

PROCEDURE

Midline catheter placement via cephalic vein

Midline catheter placement via cephalic vein under ultrasound guidance

Locations (1)

Hee-Soo Kim

Seoul, Soul-t'ukpyolsi, South Korea