Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
To Compare the Two Implant Placement Protocols to Evaluate Placement Accuracy and Post-operative Healing of the Implant
Sponsor: University of Alabama at Birmingham
Summary
The goal of this study is to evaluate two commonly utilized surgical guide protocols to determine dental implant placement accuracy compared to pre-operative computerized planning, post-operative healing and bone levels to 12-months post-placement, and patient assessed post-operative discomfort and healing using a visual acuity scale (VAS).
Official title: Assessment of Two Implant Placement Protocols to Evaluate Placement Accuracy and Post-Operative Healing
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 85 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
40
Start Date
2026-06
Completion Date
2028-07
Last Updated
2026-04-06
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
Pilot Drill Guide (PDG)
Matrix-based pilot drill guides fabricated using casts derived from digital wax ups of the proposed final restoration based upon initial implant planning and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol.
Fully Guided (FG)
3-D printed guides fabricated based upon digital wax ups and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol and guided implant placement kits.
Locations (1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States