Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT07512258
NA

To Compare the Two Implant Placement Protocols to Evaluate Placement Accuracy and Post-operative Healing of the Implant

Sponsor: University of Alabama at Birmingham

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate two commonly utilized surgical guide protocols to determine dental implant placement accuracy compared to pre-operative computerized planning, post-operative healing and bone levels to 12-months post-placement, and patient assessed post-operative discomfort and healing using a visual acuity scale (VAS).

Official title: Assessment of Two Implant Placement Protocols to Evaluate Placement Accuracy and Post-Operative Healing

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 85 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

40

Start Date

2026-06

Completion Date

2028-07

Last Updated

2026-04-06

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Pilot Drill Guide (PDG)

Matrix-based pilot drill guides fabricated using casts derived from digital wax ups of the proposed final restoration based upon initial implant planning and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol.

PROCEDURE

Fully Guided (FG)

3-D printed guides fabricated based upon digital wax ups and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol and guided implant placement kits.

Locations (1)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States