Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT07522424
NA

Comparison and Analysis of Functionality, Safety, Cost-effectiveness, and Environmental Impact of Reprocessed and New Ablation Catheters in Electrophysiological Procedures.

Sponsor: Ivan Zeljkovic

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This study evaluates whether re-sterilized (reprocessed) ablation catheters are as effective and safe as new ablation catheters when used for electrophysiological procedures. Adult patients scheduled for catheter ablation will be randomly assigned to undergo the procedure using either a new catheter or a re-sterilized catheter, with identical procedural techniques applied in both groups. The study will compare procedural efficiency, safety, costs, and environmental impact between the two approaches. The results may support more sustainable and cost-effective use of medical devices in cardiac electrophysiology.

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

200

Start Date

2026-04-30

Completion Date

2027-05-20

Last Updated

2026-04-13

Healthy Volunteers

No

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Ablation - new

Participants will undergo electrophysiological procedure (ablation). The intervention consists of the use a new ablation catheter. The key distinguishing feature of this intervention is the comparison of reprocessed versus new single-use catheters, while all other procedural aspects, including operator technique, energy delivery protocol, and peri-procedural care, are standardized and identical between groups.

PROCEDURE

Ablation - reprocessed

Participants will undergo electrophysiological procedure (ablation). The intervention consists of the use of a reprocessed ablation catheter. The reprocessed catheter has undergone validated cleaning, resterilization, and functional testing in accordance with regulatory and safety standards prior to reuse. The key distinguishing feature of this intervention is the comparison of reprocessed versus new single-use catheters, while all other procedural aspects, including operator technique, energy delivery protocol, and peri-procedural care, are standardized and identical between groups.

Locations (1)

UH Dubrava

Zagreb, Croatia