Clinical Research Directory

Outcome of Primary vs Delayed Primary Closure of Laparotomy in Dirty Abdominal Wounds

Sponsor: Ayub Teaching Hospital

Summary

This randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate and compare two different wound management strategies-primary closure (PC) and delayed primary closure (DPC)-in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for peritonitis * The primary objective is to determine which technique more effectively reduces postoperative complications, specifically surgical site infections (SSI) and wound dehiscence (burst abdomen), while also assessing the impact on the length of hospital stay (LOS) The study includes 78 patients aged 15 to 80 years with free intraperitoneal contamination * In the PC group, the abdominal wound is closed immediately following the procedure * In the DPC group, the skin and subcutaneous tissues are initially left open to allow for drainage and are washed twice weekly until the wound is free of contamination (pus, fecal matter, bile, or blood), at which point it is closed using tension sutures * This study aims to provide clinical evidence on whether the biological benefits of DPC-such as reduced bacterial colonization and improved drainage-outweigh the potential drawbacks of the technique, such as patient discomfort or prolonged care

Official title: Outcome of Primary vs Delayed Primary Closure of Laparotomy in Dirty Abdominal Wounds: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Key Details

Conditions

Interventions

Locations (1)