Clinical Research Directory

Telemedicine-Based Emergency Physician Assessment Prior to ED Entry: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sponsor: Sheba Medical Center

Summary

Background: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a growing challenge worldwide and is associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS), reduced patient satisfaction, and increased burden on healthcare systems. New approaches are needed to improve how patients are evaluated and treated. Telemedicine has been increasingly integrated into ED care and has shown feasibility and benefits in various settings. Existing models have demonstrated improvements in patient flow, reduced length of stay, and high patient satisfaction. However, despite the growing use of telemedicine in emergency medicine, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials evaluating its effectiveness and safety, particularly in models involving early remote physician assessment prior to ED evaluation. Purpose: This study aims to evaluate whether a video consultation with a senior emergency physician before entering the ED can improve the efficiency and quality of care. The study also examines whether physicians can accurately identify which patients need ED evaluation based on a remote assessment, while maintaining patient safety. Methods: A total of 200 adults who arrived at the ED were assigned to one of two groups. In the study group, participants had a video consultation with a physician before continuing with standard ED care. In the control group, participants received standard ED care only. During the video consultation, the physician performed an initial clinical assessment and could order tests or specialist consultations. The physician was also asked what their recommendation would have been if the participant had been assessed from home. Three possible decisions were recorded: * Immediate ED presentation * Scheduled ED presentation at a later time * Continued care in the community without ED presentation Outcomes: The primary outcomes focus on the effectiveness of the intervention. These include: * ED length of stay * Patient satisfaction * The ability of physicians to accurately identify participants who require ED evaluation The secondary outcome is safety, assessed by return visits to the ED within one week for the same complaint.

Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficiency of a Virtual-Hybrid Emergency Department Model Versus Standard Emergency Department Management in Non-Urgent Patients

Key Details

Conditions

Interventions

Locations (1)