Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
HIIT Versus Moderate Continuous Training in ACHD
Sponsor: University of Alberta
Summary
This study is a single center randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of an exercise training intervention (interval training or moderate continuous training) compared to usual care (no training) on exercise capacity in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Our primary aim is to determine the impact of interval training (IT) compared to moderate continuous exercise training (MCT) versus controls (no exercise) on exercise capacity as measured by peak VO2. Secondary aims are to: 1) assess the safety of exercise training in CHD, 2) evaluate the effect of exercise training on cardiac structure and function and 3) assess the effects of exercise training on quality of life and long-term physical activity.
Official title: Physical Activity in Tetralogy: A Randomized Trial of Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
16 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
47
Start Date
2015-10-20
Completion Date
2024-04-30
Last Updated
2026-04-29
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Exercise Intervention
Participants will take part in 3 exercise sessions per week of either HIIT or MCT training.
Locations (1)
Jim Pattison Center for Cardiac Rehabilitation
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada