Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Truness of Full Arch Impressions in All on x Cases
Sponsor: October 6 University
Summary
This study aims to compare the trueness and precision of three impression methodologies photogrammetry, digital intraoral scanning with splinted scan bodies, and conventional open tray impressions in the context of the All-on-X treatment concept. This will provide valuable evidence for clinicians considering digital workflows for implant-supported prostheses. Does the use of photogrammetry and digital impression techniques with splinted scan bodies result in improved accuracy in implant position transfer in the All-on-X concept compared to conventional open tray impressions?
Official title: Trueness of Full-Arch Impressions Using Photogrammetry, Splinted Digital Scan Bodies Versus Conventional Open-Tray Techniques in the All-on-x Prosthesis
Key Details
Gender
MALE
Age Range
55 Years - 65 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
11
Start Date
2026-05-01
Completion Date
2026-10-01
Last Updated
2026-05-07
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
photogrammetry based full arch impression
use of photogrammetry system to capture the positions of All on X implants digitally without physical impression material. This technique aims to achieve precise measurements and increase patient satisfaction
Digital Impression Using Splinted Scan Bodies
Digital full-arch impression using splinted scan bodies connected with resin to enhance stability. An intraoral scanner captures the splinted assembly for framework fabrication. Accuracy and patient satisfaction will be evaluated.
Conventional Open-Tray Implant Impression
Traditional full-arch open-tray impression using polyether or VPS material with splinted impression copings. This serves as the standard comparator for evaluating accuracy and patient satisfaction.
Locations (1)
October 6 University
Giza, Egypt