Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT07557212
NA

A Comparison of Accuracy Between Different Facial Scanning Techniques

Sponsor: Ain Shams University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Conventional alginate impressions are still a burden to both the patient and the operator especially in extraoral maxillofacial rehabilitations cases. Nowadays face scanners are becoming more popular with their increased accuracy in taking facial scans, facilitating the digital workflow. This study will be done to investigate the accuracy of three different face scanning techniques; stationary, handheld and mobile application techniques. A number of sixty volunteers will be recruited. Conventional facial impressions will be made for each participant and the resulting casts will be desktop scanned to act as the control group. Three face scanning techniques will be used for each participant; stationary (Ray face scanner), handheld (Shining 3d face scanner) and mobile phone applications (Heges; Maerk Simonik). The STL files will be compared to that of the control group for comparison of accuracy in the terms of Trueness and Precision.

Official title: A Comparative Study of Trueness and Precision Between Different Facial Scanning Techniques

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

Any - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

60

Start Date

2026-05-02

Completion Date

2026-11-01

Last Updated

2026-05-07

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Interventions

PROCEDURE

portable scanning

face scanning will be made using a portable face scanner

PROCEDURE

stationery scanning

ace scanning will be made using a stationery face scanner

PROCEDURE

mobile app scanning

ace scanning will be made using a mobile face scanning app