Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Xerf Device for Aesthetic Treatments
Sponsor: CynosureLutronic
Summary
The goal of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of the XERF noninvasive dual-frequency monopolar radiofrequency device for aesthetic improvement of facial aging, including fine lines and wrinkles, eyebrow lifting, and tightening of lax tissue in the lower face, submental area, and neck in healthy adults. Up to 60 participants may be enrolled across up to five clinical sites in the United States. Participants receive XERF treatments using 6.78 MHz and 2.0 MHz energy; most undergo two sessions approximately four weeks apart (the protocol allows up to three). Standardized photographs are taken at baseline and follow-up visits. Outcomes are assessed approximately 30 and 90 days after the final treatment. Effectiveness is evaluated using investigator-assessed global aesthetic improvement and participant-reported satisfaction, while safety and tolerability are assessed through procedural pain ratings and monitoring of adverse events throughout the study.
Official title: Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the XERF Device for Aesthetic Treatments
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
22 Years - 70 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
40
Start Date
2025-01-20
Completion Date
2025-08-12
Last Updated
2026-05-14
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Interventions
Noninvasive dual-frequency monopolar radiofrequency
Participants received treatment with a noninvasive contact monopolar radiofrequency (RF) device (XERF) operating at 6.78 MHz and 2.0 MHz. The device delivers RF energy using depth-dependent settings (Shallow, Middle, and Deep) selected based on the target condition and facial anatomic zone. Treatments were performed with the EFFECTOR 60 tip using sliding mode, stamping mode, or a combination, after facial cleansing and application of a thin film of ultrasound gel. Adjustable cryogen gas cooling (ICD Levels 1-3) was used for epidermal protection and comfort; no topical anesthesia was used. Participants underwent two treatment sessions approximately 4 weeks apart (the protocol allowed up to three sessions). The number of shots and total energy delivered (joules) were recorded for each treatment area.
Locations (4)
Oak Dermatology
Naperville, Illinois, United States
Maryland Dermatology Laser, Skin, & Vein Institute, LLC
Hunt Valley, Maryland, United States
New Jersey Plastic Surgery
Montclair, New Jersey, United States
Laser & Skin Surgery Center of Pennsylvania
Devon, Pennsylvania, United States