Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT07596498
NA

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Pectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

Sponsor: Ain Shams University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Pelvic organ prolapse, particularly apical prolapse, is a common condition among aging women, and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is considered the standard surgical treatment due to its high anatomical success. However, it poses technical challenges and risks related to sacral dissection. Laparoscopic pectopexy, a newer technique using the iliopectineal ligament for mesh fixation, offers a safer anatomical route with shorter operative time and fewer complications. The previous studies evaluate the sacrocolpopexy and pectopexy are all retrospective. This study is prospective randomized controlled study that adds Comparison on the success rate and learning curve of pectopexy versus sacrocolpopexy .

Official title: Comparison of the Effectiveness and Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Pectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy in Treatment of Apical Prolapse

Key Details

Gender

FEMALE

Age Range

40 Years - 75 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

30

Start Date

2026-04-01

Completion Date

2026-10-10

Last Updated

2026-05-19

Healthy Volunteers

No

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic Pectopexy

to evaluate the effectiveness and learning curve of laparoscopic pectopexy in comparison with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse performed by the same surgeon.

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

Locations (1)

Ain Shams University Hospital

Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt