Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Robot Assisted Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery for Tile B and C Pelvic Fractures
Sponsor: Junbo Liang
Summary
This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of robot assisted treatment versus conventional surgery in patients with Tile B and C pelvic fractures. Eligible patients will be stratified according to Tile fracture classification and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either robot assisted minimally invasive fixation or conventional surgical treatment. Primary and secondary outcomes include pain relief, early mobilization, functional recovery, imaging outcomes, perioperative complications, venous thromboembolism events, laboratory parameters, opioid consumption, and healthcare resource utilization. The study aims to provide evidence for optimizing surgical treatment strategies for unstable pelvic fractures.
Official title: Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Robot Assisted Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery in Patients With Tile B and C Pelvic Fractures
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
88
Start Date
2026-06-01
Completion Date
2028-12-30
Last Updated
2026-06-03
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Fixation
Robot assisted minimally invasive fixation is performed using robotic navigation assisted percutaneous screw placement for stabilization of unstable pelvic fractures.