Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Diferences in 3D Gait Analysis After Various Types of Total Hip Arthroplasty
Sponsor: Masarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s.
Summary
Patients with hip osteoarthritis who were indicated for total hip arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either a short (metaphyseal) stem or a conventional (metadiaphyseal) stem hip arthroplasty. Three-dimensional gait analysis was performed regularly (preoperatively and at multiple postoperative time points) to determine whether conservative implants result in superior objective and patient-reported outcomes
Official title: Comparative 3D Gait Analysis: Impact of Total Hip Arthroplasty Stem Anchoring (Metadiaphyseal vs Metaphyseal)
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
45 Years - 85 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
20
Start Date
2024-09-30
Completion Date
2025-01-30
Last Updated
2026-06-05
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Conservative Total Hip Arthroplasty
Conservative (metaphyseal) stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty
Conventional (metadiaphyseal) stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Locations (1)
Masaryk Hospital
Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem Region, Czechia