Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Patient Satisfaction and Prosthetic Complications of the Milled Bar Versus Screw-Retained Prostheses for Maxillary Subperiosteal Implants: A One Year Randomized Clinical Trial
Sponsor: Mansoura University
Summary
This study aims to evaluate and compare patient satisfaction and prosthetic complications between two types of prostheses: milled bar and screw-retained prostheses, used for supporting maxillary subperiosteal implants. Patients requiring maxillary rehabilitation using subperiosteal implants will be randomly assigned to receive either a milled bar-retained prosthesis or a screw-retained prosthesis. Patient satisfaction and any prosthetic complications will be clinical assessed and followed up over a one-year period to determine which prosthetic design offers better clinical outcomes and patient experience.
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
50 Years - 70 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
20
Start Date
2025-06-01
Completion Date
2026-11
Last Updated
2026-06-08
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Maxillary subperiosteal implant with milled bar-retained prosthesis
Surgical placement of a custom-milled, patient-specific CAD/CAM maxillary subperiosteal implant. Following the healing and provisional phase, a definitive milled bar-retained overdenture prosthesis will be fabricated and attached to support full-arch rehabilitation.
Maxillary subperiosteal implant with screw-retained prosthesis
Surgical placement of a custom-milled, patient-specific CAD/CAM maxillary subperiosteal implant. Following the healing and provisional phase, a definitive screw-retained prosthesis will be fabricated and fixed to support full-arch rehabilitation.
Locations (1)
Faculty of Dentistry of Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt