Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conservative Treatment for Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis Type 1-2 in Elderly Patients
Sponsor: Junbo Liang
Summary
This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of robot assisted minimally invasive treatment versus conservative treatment in elderly patients with FFP1-2 fragility fractures of the pelvis. Eligible patients will be stratified according to FFP classification and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either robot assisted minimally invasive fixation or standardized conservative treatment. Primary and secondary outcomes include pain relief, functional recovery, fracture progression, venous thromboembolism events, complications, and healthcare resource utilization. The study aims to provide evidence for optimizing treatment strategies in elderly patients with pelvic fragility fractures.
Official title: Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conservative Treatment in Elderly Patients With FFP1-2 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
60 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
152
Start Date
2026-06-01
Completion Date
2028-12-30
Last Updated
2026-06-09
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Fixation
Robot assisted minimally invasive fixation is performed using robotic navigation assisted percutaneous screw placement for stabilization of pelvic fragility fractures.