Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery for FFP3-4 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis in Elderly Patients
Sponsor: Junbo Liang
Summary
This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of robot assisted minimally invasive treatment versus conventional surgery in elderly patients with FFP3-4 fragility fractures of the pelvis. Eligible patients will be stratified according to FFP classification and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either robot assisted minimally invasive fixation or conventional surgical treatment. Primary and secondary outcomes include pain relief, early mobilization, functional recovery, perioperative complications, venous thromboembolism events, laboratory parameters, imaging outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization. The study aims to provide evidence for optimizing surgical treatment strategies in elderly patients with unstable pelvic fragility fractures.
Official title: Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery in Elderly Patients With FFP3-4 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
60 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
88
Start Date
2026-06-01
Completion Date
2028-12-30
Last Updated
2026-06-10
Healthy Volunteers
No
Interventions
Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Fixation
Robot assisted minimally invasive fixation is performed using robotic navigation assisted percutaneous screw placement for stabilization of unstable pelvic fragility fractures.
Conventional Open Fixation
Conventional open reduction and internal fixation for FFP3-4 pelvic fragility fractures performed without robotic assistance.
Locations (1)
No. 150 Ximen Road
Linhai, Zhejiang, China