Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
COMPLETED
NCT07649889

Survival After Cardiac Arrest: How New Treatment Guidelines Changed Patient Outcomes.

Sponsor: Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata del Trentino

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The goal of this retrospective observational cohort study is to evaluate whether the progressive implementation of updated post-cardiac arrest care guidelines has improved survival and neurological recovery in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Cardiac arrest is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. More than half of patients successfully resuscitated from cardiac arrest die before hospital discharge, largely due to a complex condition known as Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome (PCAS), which affects the brain, heart, and all major organ systems. Over the past decade, the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) have published updated post-resuscitation care guidelines in 2010, 2015, and 2021, introducing progressively refined treatment recommendations. However, no study has yet evaluated whether the local adoption of these evolving guidelines has translated into measurable improvements in patient outcomes over time. The main questions this study aims to answer are: * Has survival to ICU discharge improved across three successive guideline periods (2010, 2015, and 2021) in adult cardiac arrest patients admitted to the ICU? * Has neurological recovery at ICU and hospital discharge improved across the three guideline cohorts? * What is the local level of adherence to each set of guideline recommendations, and how does it relate to patient outcomes? * What is the impact of individual new interventions introduced by each guideline update on survival and organ function? * Do outcomes differ based on whether the cardiac arrest occurred outside or inside the hospital, or based on its underlying cause (cardiac, respiratory, metabolic, toxicological, or traumatic)? Researchers will compare three patient cohorts defined by the guideline period active at the time of ICU admission - Cohort A (January 2011-December 2015, treated according to 2010 guidelines), Cohort B (January 2016-March 2021, treated according to 2015 guidelines), and Cohort C (April 2021-April 2024, treated according to 2021 guidelines) - to determine whether progressive guideline implementation is associated with improved survival and neurological outcomes over time. Cohort A serves as the reference group. Participants in this study are adult patients (aged 18 years or older) who experienced cardiac arrest of any cause - whether in or out of hospital - were successfully resuscitated, and were subsequently admitted to ICU at the S. Chiara Hospital in Trento, Italy. Data are collected retrospectively from digitized medical records and cover clinical characteristics, cardiac arrest details, ICU treatments, laboratory and imaging findings, and patient outcomes including survival, length of stay, ventilator-free days, and neurological status at discharge (assessed using the Cerebral Performance Category scale). No interventions are performed as part of this study. Patient data are fully anonymized prior to analysis.

Official title: Implementation of the New Guidelines on the Management of the Patient Resuscitated From Cardiac Arrest and Impact on Survival: Retrospective Observational Study / Implementazione Delle Nuove Linee Guida Sulla Gestione Del Paziente Rianimato da Arresto Cardiaco ed Impatto Sulla Sopravvivenza: Studio Osservazionale Retrospettivo.

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - Any

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

630

Start Date

2025-03-01

Completion Date

2025-10-31

Last Updated

2026-06-16

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

OTHER

post-resuscitation care

This study focused on the real-world, bundled implementation of successive ERC-ESICM guideline frameworks - rather than evaluating any single intervention (e.g., targeted temperature management, coronary angiography timing, or neuroprognostication alone). While most existing trials isolate one treatment component, this study captures the cumulative clinical effect of progressively refined, comprehensive post-resuscitation care bundles as delivered in routine ICU practice across three distinct guideline eras (2010, 2015, 2021) over 14 years within a single center. This longitudinal, within-institution design controls for center-level variability, allowing direct comparison of guideline-driven practice evolution and its impact on survival and neurological recovery. No experimental intervention is applied; the exposure of interest is the guideline framework active at the time of each patient's ICU admission.

Locations (1)

Santa Chiara Hospital

Trento, Italy, Italy