Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Bolus Hydrocortisone in Septic Shock
Sponsor: Benha University
Summary
Septic shock is a life-threatening condition in which infection causes dangerously low blood pressure and organ dysfunction despite fluid resuscitation and vasopressor treatment. Hydrocortisone is commonly used in patients with septic shock who continue to require vasopressors. However, it is uncertain whether hydrocortisone should be administered as a continuous intravenous infusion or as intermittent intravenous bolus doses. This randomized controlled trial evaluates whether continuous intravenous hydrocortisone infusion improves clinical outcomes compared with intermittent intravenous hydrocortisone boluses in adult patients with septic shock. Participants receive either hydrocortisone 200 mg/day by continuous infusion or hydrocortisone 50 mg intravenously every 6 hours, in addition to standard septic shock management. The study evaluates 28-day mortality, recovery from shock, duration of vasopressor therapy, mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, inflammatory markers, and organ dysfunction scores.
Official title: From Bolus to Infusion: Stress-Dose Steroid Methods and Prognostic Value in Septic Shock Therapy
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
110
Start Date
2026-01-01
Completion Date
2026-07-01
Last Updated
2026-07-10
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Hydrocortisone Continuous Infusion
Hydrocortisone was administered intravenously as a continuous infusion at a total dose of 200 mg per day.
Hydrocortisone Intermittent Bolus
Hydrocortisone was administered intravenously as 50 mg every 6 hours, for a total dose of 200 mg per day.
Locations (1)
Benha University Hospitals
Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate, Egypt