Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
COMPLETED
NCT07697300
NA

COMT, MAOA, and SLC6A4 Polymorphisms and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Success

Sponsor: Marmara University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between COMT, MAOA, and SLC6A4 genetic polymorphisms and the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars. Patients presenting with moderate to severe pain were enrolled. Before anesthesia, pain intensity was assessed using the Heft-Parker Visual Analog Scale (HP-VAS), and pulpal vitality was evaluated using cold and electric pulp tests. All participants received a standardized inferior alveolar nerve block with 4% articaine containing epinephrine. Fifteen minutes after injection, pulpal anesthesia was reassessed using cold and electric pulp tests. Patients who continued to respond to these tests were considered to have unsuccessful pulpal anesthesia and were excluded from the study. Patients with no response to either test were included in the study, and root canal treatment was initiated. Pain experienced during the procedure was assessed using the HP-VAS. Buccal swab samples were collected for genomic DNA isolation, and COMT, MAOA, and SLC6A4 polymorphisms were analyzed using a Real-Time PCR-based TaqMan genotyping assay. The association between genetic polymorphisms and the success of inferior alveolar nerve block was statistically evaluated.

Official title: The Relationship Between COMT, MAOA, and SLC6A4 Polymorphisms and the Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

15 Years - 60 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

95

Start Date

2025-11-12

Completion Date

2026-04-28

Last Updated

2026-07-14

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block with 4% Articaine

A standardized inferior alveolar nerve block was administered using 4% articaine with epinephrine to patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars. Fifteen minutes after injection, pulpal anesthesia was evaluated using cold and electric pulp tests. Participants who continued to respond to either test were considered to have unsuccessful pulpal anesthesia and were excluded from the study. Root canal treatment was initiated in participants who showed no response to both tests. Pain experienced during treatment was assessed using the Heft-Parker Visual Analog Scale (HP-VAS). Anesthetic success was defined as an HP-VAS score of less than 54 mm, whereas an HP-VAS score of 54 mm or greater was considered anesthetic failure.

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University

Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)